.

Cosgrove on Tabor: 'The Town Will Not Appeal the Arrowood Decision'

"The time has come to put an end to one of the most disappointing chapters of Branford’s history," First Selectman Jamie Cosgrove stated in a release.

Town sign outside of Branford Town Hall. Credit: Julie Weisberg
Town sign outside of Branford Town Hall. Credit: Julie Weisberg
The following is a public statement from Branford First Selectman Jaimie Cosgrove.

After reviewing a legal memorandum from Town Counsel analyzing the likelihood of winning a reversal of Judge Sheriden’s decision in Town of Branford v. Arrowood Indemnity Co. et al., I have reached the conclusion that is not in the best interest of the taxpayers and citizens of Branford to pursue the remnants of the Tabor litigation any further.  

The time has come to put an end to one of the most disappointing chapters of Branford’s history.  It is my hope that the Board of Selectmen’s recent action to remove Tabor from consideration as a site for a new Public Works facility, and my decision today to bring an end to this final piece of Tabor-related litigation, will allow our town to move beyond the negativity associated with Tabor.

My decision today is based on a variety of factors, including the following:

The Town was given a legal opinion in 2007 that insurance coverage under the Arrowood policy was unlikely, based on legal precedent and the wording of the policy.

Notwithstanding the 2007 opinion, the Town retained a New York law firm in 2008 to develop a new theory of recovery in order to pursue a claim against Arrowood.  

The Town has paid over $345,000 in legal fees associated with pursuing this claim.

The Town has been paying its legal fees in this case out of borrowed funds, which means taxpayers will pay both the attorneys’ fees as well as interest on the bond monies used to pay those fees.

Even if the Town were to be successful in overturning Judge Sheriden’s decision (which, after reading the legal analysis of the issue, I am convinced would not be the case), the litigation would continue beyond a simple appeal, because there exist other defenses to coverage that Arrowood could raise, but which have not yet been considered by the court. This will mean hundreds of thousands of dollars more in legal fees, with no clear prospect of recovery.   

In short, I do not believe Branford should throw good money after bad. 

The Town will not appeal the Arrowood decision. 

gail March 08, 2014 at 08:09 AM
Finally a leader with a brain. The previous administration cost us a lot of money. Thank God for Republicans.
John March 08, 2014 at 08:14 AM
Good move, let it go.
Arbie March 09, 2014 at 06:55 AM
Now recover the losses by turning this property into the largest ATV & dirt bike park in New England. Secure the property and charge entrance fees to ride there. Vehicles will have to be registered so the state will collect revenue, the towns will collect property taxes. Dealers will sell more machines. Local merchants will increase sales with new people coming to town. Most importantly riders will have a place in this state to ride legally keeping them off the streets and other places they are not welcomed. This is a win for everyone, now lets see if someone has the guts to run with it and make it happen. Otherwise New Hampshire welcomes the revenue that could be ours that riders bring to that state. Now before the uninformed jump all over this with negatives...research this idea first. All ATV & dirt bike exhaust noise and safety requirements will need to be maintained and enforced, there will be no negative impact to the area. Done correctly and this could be a major positive impact on Branford and the State of CT.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »