Recently, I got a text message from my . It was a picture of a flyer advertising for single’s night hosted by Susie Cupid. Are You My Person was written in bold letters above a picture of Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman holding each other tenderly. Oh, romance! The marketing totally appealed to me; I mean, really, who doesn’t love Casablanca?
Initially, I was afraid that the event wouldn’t appeal to a young crowd and I’d end up at a “seniors' night,” but in the spirit of being open to possibilities, specifically the possibility that my soul mate also loves classic films and the fear that I wouldn’t have anything to write about this week, I signed up. Of course, I wasn’t about to drive to on the Branford shoreline alone; I made Boss Lady and T come with me. Dating is, if nothing else, a team sport.
When we walked in the door, Susie Cupid handed us each a string of Mardi Gras beads. They were part of an icebreaker game in which the object was to earn as many beads as possible by getting people to say, “no.” When I heard how the game worked, I rolled my eyes – getting guys to say no is not my problem. Still, I went for an easy kill: I asked Boss Lady how we were supposed to get beads. She said, “By getting guys to say NO,” and looked at me like I was dumb. I laughed and demanded her beads. Unsporting, I know, but all’s fair in love and war.
The girls and I took in the scene, trying to figure out which beads to go after first. We were the youngest people in the room by at least a decade – two in most cases. Still, I found a few prospects – a miserable looking dude in a brown hoodie and a cutie in a striped shirt.
I quickly called dibs on the guy in the striped shirt and T said, “Um, I don’t think he’s here for the dating thing.” Unfortunately, she was right. He was eating dinner with his grandfather and left immediately after scarfing down a plate of fish and chips.
As I shifted my attention to Brown Hoodie Dude, the event organizers called everyone into the front room to play a game. I quickly finished my glass of wine and joined the crowd, trying to figure out where to best position myself for maximum exposure to Brown Hoodie Dude. He was nowhere in sight. A flash of brown caught my attention outside; he was sprinting through the freezing rain to his car. He never looked back.
I could tell T was planning a similar escape, but I wasn’t ready to give up on the night. I scanned the room and saw two ladies drinking Appletinis. They looked like they were having fun so I decided to get an Appletini of my own.
I walked up and toasted both ladies to their brilliant idea. They laughed and introduced themselves. Since I hadn’t had dinner and was quickly working through my second drink, I’m pretty sure I blurted out my entire life story to include some personal and embarrassing details, maybe or maybe not involving my . When our glasses were empty, we decided to get another round and find some menfolk to talk to.
A new drink in hand, it was time to strategically position ourselves around a little table and look approachable.
In the spirit of being “approachable,” the Boss Lady loudly alluded to the fact that I like older men. On cue, a silver-haired stud was at my side. I shot her the look of death, looked at him and said, “Um, sorry, not really. I like young dudes. But, not like illegally young or anything. You know?” Charming, right?
The Silver Fox walked away without another word. An older man dating a younger woman isn't that uncommon and may even be one of the secrets to our evoluntionary success, according to ABC News. Still, I aim for 30-year-olds (plus or minus 5 years).
My eyes frantically darted around the room, desperately seeking someone who could reminisce about Fraggle Rock, the rise and fall of Crystal Clear Pepsi, slap bracelets and pogs. I needed to find someone young enough to have had their Tamagotchi taken away by their 5th-grade teacher.
That’s when I saw The Goatee. I wasn’t wearing my glasses, but I sensed I’d found the only guy in the room who might remember listening to Savage Garden on the American Top 40 Countdown with Casey Kasem. I smiled.
The Goatee and his friend responded favorably to my subtle nods, waves and shouts of, “HEY YOU!” and I soon found myself in a mixed group with one thing in common – empty stomachs! It was time to move the party to for wings.
It didn’t take me long to figure out that neither The Goatee nor his friend were my Person. Not only were their two combined ages more than Boss Lady, T’s and mine combined, they had kids, ex-wives and memories of a world in which music videos did not exist. I’m pretty sure the feeling was mutual since I was in an especially loud and goofy mood. They probably felt like they were babysitting. Still, we were all just out to have fun, and we were having fun, even though no one wanted to admit it.
I certainly didn’t find my Person at Dockside, but I had a great time talking to people. I find at these events, everyone needs an excuse for going. No one wants to say that they are actually looking for their right “Person,” even though that’s exactly who we are all seeking. The most common excuse I heard on Single’s Night was, “I’m here with a friend” – a statement in which “against my will” is implied. My excuse was, “I’m a dating columnist, on assignment” with the sentiment of, “my editor made me go” implied. I said it seriously, as if I sometimes I get shot at while on a writing assignment just like those reporters in Iraq.
This is Maureen Dixon, live from the dating scene trenches in the greater New Haven area signing off.
I recognize my preferences & beliefs aren't universal. I further recognize the market recognizes a wide range. - I posted after reading Mr. Goldwyn & Mr. Dugdale, because the blog post was more than a professional article, it was personal and relevant to an age group and some universal experiences. > They are entitled to their opinions. > I felt Ms. Dixon might feel "personally" hurt by being "judged." - My dad believed there was only one perfect person. And they crucified him. - I am not perfect. I do not expect perfection from anyone. I do not expect people to live up to (or down to) my standards - My blog posts normally stay related to Political & not Personal. I made an exception, related to this post. There are Political, Ethical, Moral, Criminal, Civil, & Constitutional Standards which are supposed to be met in the Political realm. > Private, Corporate and Public Businesses also have Standards which are supposed to be met. - The dating scene is not codified. Personal choices are not codified. Certain aberrant and hurtful conduct is codified. Even then ... (PA State among others) . I objected to certain judgmental moral smugness on personal issues.
Well, it is almost two generations later and women have pushed the ticking clock to a later time. Having children,and spending 20 years of raising them when they are in middle-age now seems the norm. It also makes your parents wait much longer for them to be grandparents - how inconsiderate. Well, we are the Sr Citizens now and worry when our children will put us in the nursing home because it is too much to raise children and parents at the same time.
p.s. Wondering how many people actually used the QR code on the single's night flyer. Ha.
with her mother and sister leading the way shopping. Mr. Goldwyn, you are projecting your personal experiences and prejudices as the way life is! Or "correct" way to do things. U R not considering diversity of our American cultures & subcultures, with individual choices within each. - I strongly suspect we would agree on many "values issues." I strongly suspect you and Ms. Dixon would agree on many "values issues." - Not intending to be insulting nor condescending, but Mr. Goldwyn, do you honestly believe you have the monopoly on wisdom and social mores? - I recently read that people often can not accept that their view might be wrong. - J K Galbraith spoke at McGovern's Stratford Inn In one of his books he wrote about: 1 - "the EMANCIPATION of BELIEF." 2 - "the PLANNING SYSTEM." - Lest you dismiss McGovern / Galbraith, be aware W F BUCKLEY also spoke there as well as Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Igor Sikorsky Jr., - McGovern spoke at Univ Bridgeport 2 years prior. 2 events>I listened to his prattle. 3rd event I asked him 3 questions. > He has yet to answer Question # 2. > His reply to Question # 3? "That goes against everything I believe." - Sept 1987, after iRAN CONNtRA, I gave 12 Senate & some Congress offices 200 pages documents & affadavits. > I asked "What if europe, russia or levant created OPEC? > I Mathematically proved OIL SALES1960-1987 could buy entire DJIA.
Very interesting anecdote - it's humbling and sometimes ironic when we are blessed enough to find that perfect person and they redefine the very idea of perfection before our eyes. And I completely agree with you in that,"Most people would like to be recognized and appreciated for who they are."
- Sometimes going off topic can cause readers to react to topic, can't it? - As someone who has been targeted multiple times of potentially deadly attacks, and who believes innocents have been irreparably harmed, any forum is appropriate to suggest "Carpe Diem." - Oh that I and others could enjoy "Otimum cum dignate." - I wonder, since this blog was a "Patch assignment," if the Patch would do columns and stories and polls along the lines of the "60 minutes story about congress, senate, and D. C. INSIDER TRADERS and TRAITORS? - While you choose to prefer romance .... There are some very unromantic topics which affect your life and the lives of others, much like the experiment "The invisible gorilla." - For what some have unnecessarily endured ...HELL is appropriate.
First.. So you accept that we live in a society where morality changes yet you degrade those who live in today's standards?? OK.. so essentially you are saying that the entire population of youth have no sense of morality? Or are you saying that they have a sense of morality, but these morals are not up to your standards? Let's talk about generational morality.. Things haven't changed much and while there is a shift in morals, it doesn't make it better or worse. The generation of today puts much more weight in equality as a moral to live by. A person living a righteous life would not degrade women or deny a person a civil right because of race or sexual orientation. Back "in your day" these things were common place and no one considered someone immoral or unethical for these things. I'd also LOVE to point out that your generation was no stranger to infidelity and sexual experimentation.
And let's talk about the crazy idea that it is inconsiderate to wait to have children because your parents DESPERATELY want to be grand parents.. What in the world is this?! A parent can not put that on a child. What if the daughter is having difficulties conceiving? What about waiting for the right person? Why is there a deadline as to when you find your soulmate / the one you want to raise children with? Just because it's inconsiderate to make your parents wait an extra 5-8 years to have grandkids?
Studies are actually showing that more and more girls are abstaining from sex than in the last 20 years. Because sex is an open topic and people are talking about it more and more, girls are becoming informed and it's not so much of a taboo to just TALK about it and ask questions. An educated woman is one who makes the right choices for HER. So your in laws set up your mattress while you were on your honeymoon and you think this makes you what.. more moral? Honestly, thing kind of thing still happens often.. Newlyweds leave on a honeymoon and the parents go ahead and help get their home affairs in order for when they come home. In fact, that is almost EXACTLY what happened when I got married. I'm not sure how that makes me any more moral or better than anyone else though. Just because your grandson is a man whore and is preying on the vapid club girls of today doesn't mean that society is like that. Your comments are painting a very sad picture of your home life.
it looks like we sparked a Healthy discussion. I honestly believe that more women get involved in politics and break the glass ceiling, more beneficial changes will happen in society. Both Men & Woman can be and have been political HO's. However there are differences in experiences, perspectives, communication skills, logic, intution, and emotion, which I believe can effect change. - Further technology and science looks to cornucopian material wealth, One can not spell material withour MATER. Zero sum wealth, is becoming less constraining as a necessity. - TV indicated 25 % of wives earn more than their Husbands. That tread will also affect dating and social mores & conduct. - Such is my opinion that even in searching for Mr Right or Mr. let's enjoy life, there are tons of outside influences ... - Even in casual relationships, there are hidden baggage and treasures, that even those carrying those, do not realize they possess. - The twist, turns, & dialectics within this blog string is somewhat evidenciary of that hypothesis. - I now feel badly for Mr. Goldwyn, as it was not my intent to gang up on him and he seems to enjoy using the blog to reach out to try to help people. We can neve have enough people who are honest & passionate in trying to help others, can we? - Best wishes to all.
Anyhow, as for the age differences: has anyone heard of the Half+7 rule? The youngest age a girl should be is half of the guy's age, plus 7. Example: 40yo man, 27yo woman. Men - use that as your guide to avoid making young women uncomfortable! If you're 50, you should probably avoid chatting up a random young-twenty-something. Stay classy out there!
It is amazing how people see things that are not there. How your read things that I did not say. To those who are professionals in the field of societies please note what I said. I tried to say that in my generation, couples got married at an earlier age, and women had children at an earlier age and most couples were virgins at the time of their first marriage, and that was over 50 years ago. I then said how morality is today, without commenting on if it was right or wrong, just that it had changed. I did not use the words "Sexual Revolution" but that was what happened. When I was married, it was a life committment. Today I believe 50% of all marriages end in divorce. I didn't mention couples getting learners permits prior to a marriage License in order to lower the divorce statistic. All that I said was that our society has changed in the last 50 years and our morality is more permissive. I ended by saying that 50 years ago I could go into a bar and drink at age 18 and noone was carded, but I had to be 21 in order to vote. All boys at age 18 had to register for Selective Service, but not the girls. Today you must be 21 to drink in the bar but you may vote at age 18 In my generation we had Ogden Nash, and he said "Candy is dandy, but Liquor is quicker. Those of you who are from a younger generation, please enjoy your freedom, I envy you.
I choose romance when men and women and relationships are the topic. As for the unromantic topics that affect our lives, I believe I've seen my share of real and collateral damage as a firefighter, mother of two deployed military officers, and partner of a narcotics/major crime detective in a border state. Kind of you, though, to assume that I speak from naivete.
I appreciate the services that you and your children provide to fellow human beings. Thank you. While topics compliance are nice, there are room for overlap in blogosphere. Francine: what you describe as "naivete," I would describe as a "belief system." What if your beliefs were wrong? What if your sons were put in "harm's way" by effectual criminals? What if people who profit from WAR, CRIME, & DRUGS like having casualties and martyrs, to reinforce the illusions and have those in the Military and Police so concentrated on the "useful idiots" that NO ONE QUESTIONS AUTHORITY that the SYSTEM REINFORCES ITSELF, by having the GUARDIANS fighting the wrong battles. General OMAR BRADLEY said about KOREA: WRONG PLACE WRONG TIME WRONG WAR WRONG ENEMY - ex-General, ex-Supreme Allied Commander, retiring President Eisenhower > Military Industrial (Political) Complex "unwarranted" (you KNOW what that means) "influence over every home, business, & government office" > Scientific Tech-NO-LOGIC-al ELITE "controlling" "PUBLIC OPINION" - Writings of George McGovern (LIBERAL Democrat): The CIA, DOD, FBI violated the Constitution & US Code, here & abroad. FRANK CHURCH Senate Committee = GOOGLE. FBI "ILLEGAL" CoIntel CIA + DOD + others > - Speaking & writing: J K GALBRAITH (Nobel prize/Socialist) + W F BUCKLEY Jr (Ultra Conservative Republican) questions authority. - Maybe I'm wrong? However, I favor Better lives=your family
It is easy for people to take offense where none was intended, because we all have subjective interpetations & perceptions. I rarely get involved in non political topics. My intent was not to hurt anyone's feelings. This innocuos blog string which I passed on posting a couple times, became very interesting. We learn more from our critics than our supporters. Posting thoughts are very inexact & not always complete.
Check out this statistic: "According to the report, for people born in 1955 or later, "the proportion ever divorced had actually declined," compared with those among people born earlier. " How about you read a book called "Marriage: A history" it will teach you something. It shows how polls taken in the 20's prove that 50% of women were having premarital sex. Statistics are showing that there is actually a rise in women and men who choose to abstain - so what about or sexual "morality" now? Wouldn't that be you?? Wouldn't that mean that YOUR generation actually has more divorces than those who succeed you? You might also want to read "The Way We Never Were" to help you see through clear glasses instead of the rose-colored ones you wear.
In response to your comment about morality of your time being MORE PERMISSIVE than the morality of today. Back then your morality allowed you to degrade women and withhold civil rights to individuals. Today, morality says you can not do that - less permissive. You are only talking about sex, and while sex may have been considered more permissive, the truth is that people are not having more sex than before, they are just talking about it more.
Say No to Make Your Day in the Stratford schools -- 9 out of ten dentists agree.