.
Feedback

The Young and The Restless

Expectation Management. We’ll just make that the theme of today’s column.

Recently, I got a text message from my . It was a picture of a flyer advertising for single’s night hosted by Susie CupidAre You My Person was written in bold letters above a picture of Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman holding each other tenderly. Oh, romance! The marketing totally appealed to me; I mean, really, who doesn’t love Casablanca?

Initially, I was afraid that the event wouldn’t appeal to a young crowd and I’d end up at a “seniors' night,” but in the spirit of being open to possibilities, specifically the possibility that my soul mate also loves classic films and the fear that I wouldn’t have anything to write about this week, I signed up.  Of course, I wasn’t about to drive to  on the Branford shoreline alone; I made Boss Lady and T come with me. Dating is, if nothing else, a team sport.

When we walked in the door, Susie Cupid handed us each a string of Mardi Gras beads. They were part of an icebreaker game in which the object was to earn as many beads as possible by getting people to say, “no.” When I heard how the game worked, I rolled my eyes – getting guys to say no is not my problem. Still, I went for an easy kill: I asked Boss Lady how we were supposed to get beads. She said, “By getting guys to say NO,” and looked at me like I was dumb.  I laughed and demanded her beads. Unsporting, I know, but all’s fair in love and war. 

The girls and I took in the scene, trying to figure out which beads to go after first.  We were the youngest people in the room by at least a decade – two in most cases. Still, I found a few prospects – a miserable looking dude in a brown hoodie and a cutie in a striped shirt.

I quickly called dibs on the guy in the striped shirt and T said, “Um, I don’t think he’s here for the dating thing.” Unfortunately, she was right. He was eating dinner with his grandfather and left immediately after scarfing down a plate of fish and chips.

As I shifted my attention to Brown Hoodie Dude, the event organizers called everyone into the front room to play a game. I quickly finished my glass of wine and joined the crowd, trying to figure out where to best position myself for maximum exposure to Brown Hoodie Dude. He was nowhere in sight.  A flash of brown caught my attention outside; he was sprinting through the freezing rain to his car. He never looked back.

I could tell T was planning a similar escape, but I wasn’t ready to give up on the night.  I scanned the room and saw two ladies drinking Appletinis. They looked like they were having fun so I decided to get an Appletini of my own.

I walked up and toasted both ladies to their brilliant idea. They laughed and introduced themselves. Since I hadn’t had dinner and was quickly working through my second drink, I’m pretty sure I blurted out my entire life story to include some personal and embarrassing details, maybe or maybe not involving my . When our glasses were empty, we decided to get another round and find some menfolk to talk to.

A new drink in hand, it was time to strategically position ourselves around a little table and look approachable.

In the spirit of being “approachable,” the Boss Lady loudly alluded to the fact that I like older men. On cue, a silver-haired stud was at my side. I shot her the look of death, looked at him and said, “Um, sorry, not really. I like young dudes. But, not like illegally young or anything. You know?” Charming, right?

The Silver Fox walked away without another word. An older man dating a younger woman isn't that uncommon and may even be one of the secrets to our evoluntionary success, according to ABC News. Still, I aim for 30-year-olds (plus or minus 5 years).

My eyes frantically darted around the room, desperately seeking someone who could reminisce about Fraggle Rock, the rise and fall of Crystal Clear Pepsi, slap bracelets and pogs. I needed to find someone young enough to have had their Tamagotchi taken away by their 5th-grade teacher.

That’s when I saw The Goatee. I wasn’t wearing my glasses, but I sensed I’d found the only guy in the room who might remember listening to Savage Garden on the American Top 40 Countdown with Casey Kasem.  I smiled.

The Goatee and his friend responded favorably to my subtle nods, waves and shouts of, “HEY YOU!” and I soon found myself in a mixed group with one thing in common – empty stomachs! It was time to move the party to for wings.

It didn’t take me long to figure out that neither The Goatee nor his friend were my Person. Not only were their two combined ages more than Boss Lady, T’s and mine combined, they had kids, ex-wives and memories of a world in which music videos did not exist.  I’m pretty sure the feeling was mutual since I was in an especially loud and goofy mood. They probably felt like they were babysitting. Still, we were all just out to have fun, and we were having fun, even though no one wanted to admit it.

I certainly didn’t find my Person at Dockside, but I had a great time talking to people. I find at these events, everyone needs an excuse for going. No one wants to say that they are actually looking for their right “Person,” even though that’s exactly who we are all seeking. The most common excuse I heard on Single’s Night was, “I’m here with a friend” – a statement in which “against my will” is implied.  My excuse was, “I’m a dating columnist, on assignment” with the sentiment of, “my editor made me go” implied. I said it seriously, as if I sometimes I get shot at while on a writing assignment just like those reporters in Iraq.

This is Maureen Dixon, live from the dating scene trenches in the greater New Haven area signing off.

Scott November 13, 2011 at 02:39 pm
Nice article. Your references to my childhood toys really hit home.
George E. Mulligan November 13, 2011 at 04:54 pm
I turn 60 years old this week.
I recognize my preferences & beliefs aren't universal. I further recognize the market recognizes a wide range. - I posted after reading Mr. Goldwyn & Mr. Dugdale, because the blog post was more than a professional article, it was personal and relevant to an age group and some universal experiences. > They are entitled to their opinions. > I felt Ms. Dixon might feel "personally" hurt by being "judged." - My dad believed there was only one perfect person. And they crucified him. - I am not perfect. I do not expect perfection from anyone. I do not expect people to live up to (or down to) my standards - My blog posts normally stay related to Political & not Personal. I made an exception, related to this post. There are Political, Ethical, Moral, Criminal, Civil, & Constitutional Standards which are supposed to be met in the Political realm. > Private, Corporate and Public Businesses also have Standards which are supposed to be met. - The dating scene is not codified. Personal choices are not codified. Certain aberrant and hurtful conduct is codified. Even then ... (PA State among others) . I objected to certain judgmental moral smugness on personal issues.
RONALD M GOLDWYN November 13, 2011 at 05:17 pm
George, we live in a society where morality changes. My wife was married at age 21 because her mother thought that at age 24 she would be an "Old Maid". Motherhood came before a careerand being a homemaker was to be a desired career.
Well, it is almost two generations later and women have pushed the ticking clock to a later time. Having children,and spending 20 years of raising them when they are in middle-age now seems the norm. It also makes your parents wait much longer for them to be grandparents - how inconsiderate. Well, we are the Sr Citizens now and worry when our children will put us in the nursing home because it is too much to raise children and parents at the same time.
thinkpinkxoxoxo November 13, 2011 at 05:33 pm
I had my Tamagotchi taken away. Will you go on a date with me? Also, to the people questioning why you must drink... Because an appletini is delicious!
p.s. Wondering how many people actually used the QR code on the single's night flyer. Ha.
M.E. November 13, 2011 at 05:38 pm
Fantastic article and clearly more provocative than the author intended - great viewpoints & discussion! While some clearly lack the perspective of the younger generation, Ms Dixon clearly brings a great & accessible prospective to her readers - I'm a new fan!
George E. Mulligan November 13, 2011 at 05:38 pm
Last night I saw a preteen pushing her Gram's or great gram's wheelchair,
with her mother and sister leading the way shopping. Mr. Goldwyn, you are projecting your personal experiences and prejudices as the way life is! Or "correct" way to do things. U R not considering diversity of our American cultures & subcultures, with individual choices within each. - I strongly suspect we would agree on many "values issues." I strongly suspect you and Ms. Dixon would agree on many "values issues." - Not intending to be insulting nor condescending, but Mr. Goldwyn, do you honestly believe you have the monopoly on wisdom and social mores? - I recently read that people often can not accept that their view might be wrong. - J K Galbraith spoke at McGovern's Stratford Inn In one of his books he wrote about: 1 - "the EMANCIPATION of BELIEF." 2 - "the PLANNING SYSTEM." - Lest you dismiss McGovern / Galbraith, be aware W F BUCKLEY also spoke there as well as Arthur Schlesinger Jr., Igor Sikorsky Jr., - McGovern spoke at Univ Bridgeport 2 years prior. 2 events>I listened to his prattle. 3rd event I asked him 3 questions. > He has yet to answer Question # 2. > His reply to Question # 3? "That goes against everything I believe." - Sept 1987, after iRAN CONNtRA, I gave 12 Senate & some Congress offices 200 pages documents & affadavits. > I asked "What if europe, russia or levant created OPEC? > I Mathematically proved OIL SALES1960-1987 could buy entire DJIA.
Francine Murtaugh November 13, 2011 at 07:21 pm
How the hell did this degrade into a Iran Contra discussion? Old dudes, lighten up, be true to yourselves and love and life and the ladies who can take your breath away even at your gray bearded jaded age. Just sayin, as one of the ladies your age...
Maureen Dixon November 14, 2011 at 01:16 am
Thanks for the comment Mr. Mulligan!
Very interesting anecdote - it's humbling and sometimes ironic when we are blessed enough to find that perfect person and they redefine the very idea of perfection before our eyes. And I completely agree with you in that,"Most people would like to be recognized and appreciated for who they are."
George E. Mulligan November 14, 2011 at 03:08 am
Francine, thank you for your opinion.
- Sometimes going off topic can cause readers to react to topic, can't it? - As someone who has been targeted multiple times of potentially deadly attacks, and who believes innocents have been irreparably harmed, any forum is appropriate to suggest "Carpe Diem." - Oh that I and others could enjoy "Otimum cum dignate." - I wonder, since this blog was a "Patch assignment," if the Patch would do columns and stories and polls along the lines of the "60 minutes story about congress, senate, and D. C. INSIDER TRADERS and TRAITORS? - While you choose to prefer romance .... There are some very unromantic topics which affect your life and the lives of others, much like the experiment "The invisible gorilla." - For what some have unnecessarily endured ...HELL is appropriate.
Lindsay November 14, 2011 at 03:46 am
Oh Ronald, you give me SOO much to respond to.
First.. So you accept that we live in a society where morality changes yet you degrade those who live in today's standards?? OK.. so essentially you are saying that the entire population of youth have no sense of morality? Or are you saying that they have a sense of morality, but these morals are not up to your standards? Let's talk about generational morality.. Things haven't changed much and while there is a shift in morals, it doesn't make it better or worse. The generation of today puts much more weight in equality as a moral to live by. A person living a righteous life would not degrade women or deny a person a civil right because of race or sexual orientation. Back "in your day" these things were common place and no one considered someone immoral or unethical for these things. I'd also LOVE to point out that your generation was no stranger to infidelity and sexual experimentation.
Lindsay November 14, 2011 at 03:46 am
Now let's talk about your completely and entirely insane assumption that because women are having babies later in life that they are less likely to care for their aging family members.. WOAH! How about the fact that the lifespan of a human has greatly increased and proportionally, the time frames for life milestones have changed such as marriage, children, retirement.. It sounds more to me that there is resentment in the fact that women are choosing careers over the sevitude of their husbands than anything else.
And let's talk about the crazy idea that it is inconsiderate to wait to have children because your parents DESPERATELY want to be grand parents.. What in the world is this?! A parent can not put that on a child. What if the daughter is having difficulties conceiving? What about waiting for the right person? Why is there a deadline as to when you find your soulmate / the one you want to raise children with? Just because it's inconsiderate to make your parents wait an extra 5-8 years to have grandkids?
Lindsay November 14, 2011 at 03:51 am
Here's another really novel idea.. Do some research before assuming that what happens in your personal life is the norm in society.
Studies are actually showing that more and more girls are abstaining from sex than in the last 20 years. Because sex is an open topic and people are talking about it more and more, girls are becoming informed and it's not so much of a taboo to just TALK about it and ask questions. An educated woman is one who makes the right choices for HER. So your in laws set up your mattress while you were on your honeymoon and you think this makes you what.. more moral? Honestly, thing kind of thing still happens often.. Newlyweds leave on a honeymoon and the parents go ahead and help get their home affairs in order for when they come home. In fact, that is almost EXACTLY what happened when I got married. I'm not sure how that makes me any more moral or better than anyone else though. Just because your grandson is a man whore and is preying on the vapid club girls of today doesn't mean that society is like that. Your comments are painting a very sad picture of your home life.
Emily Dixon November 14, 2011 at 04:36 am
Fortunately, because of the plights of many strong willed women in the past, we can now vote and have a voice that influences more than what dish will be prepared for dinner. A woman is now able to follow her dreams and pursue a career, and also have children if she so chooses. No longer is it a choice between career or marriage and family, women are now able to have both if they desire. Our sexual organs hold no merit over our contributions to society. Modern women delaying motherhood and marriage seems to be a wise decision, as the divorce rate from young married couples skyrockets. By choosing to wait for later in life they can raise their children in a happy, functioning home in which both parents are equal, valued members of society. It is not an either/or scenario, and while I believe raising children is the most important job any parent can have, I think children benefit from seeing their mother's succeed. I know my son will be proud to see his mother follow her dreams and reach her goals, for he will be with me every step of the way and I hope this will inspire him to be driven in his life, as well. Again, thank you for sharing your insights and your experiences, I'm sure my generation will have some culture shock at what our children's generation deems as an appropriate lifestyle, but you can't stop progress.
Emily Dixon November 14, 2011 at 04:38 am
First allow me to comment on the article itself. Excellent job as always, Maureen! Your anecdotes of adventures in the dating world are always entertaining, and this week was no exception. Now I would like to address Mr. Goldwyn. I appreciate your opinions and experience, and thank you for sharing them. I completely agree that we live in a society where morality changes. Being an anthropologist, I can affirm this statement's validity. Yet I must address your ideas about motherhood. Perhaps it is possible that being a homemaker was the desired career for women at that time because they were born and acculturated to believe their purpose in life was to find a husband, bear his children, and run his household. Fortunately for the modern generation, women before us have fought for equal rights. We have gained suffrage, and the notion that our sexual organs does not determine our status as "human beings" is now being accepted... for the most part. Because of the women's rights movements and feminism, our society is now valuing women and appreciating their contributions. Interestingly enough, there are many societies that in the time frame you're referring to were matriarchal. Women have always held positions of power, both politically and religiously, without it negatively impacting their abilities to have children and maintain families. Western society is patriarchal, and in the past has rejected notions of women being anything but vessels for children and housekeepers.
George E. Mulligan November 14, 2011 at 04:53 am
Maureen, between your blog and the comments of myself and Mr Goldwyn,
it looks like we sparked a Healthy discussion. I honestly believe that more women get involved in politics and break the glass ceiling, more beneficial changes will happen in society. Both Men & Woman can be and have been political HO's. However there are differences in experiences, perspectives, communication skills, logic, intution, and emotion, which I believe can effect change. - Further technology and science looks to cornucopian material wealth, One can not spell material withour MATER. Zero sum wealth, is becoming less constraining as a necessity. - TV indicated 25 % of wives earn more than their Husbands. That tread will also affect dating and social mores & conduct. - Such is my opinion that even in searching for Mr Right or Mr. let's enjoy life, there are tons of outside influences ... - Even in casual relationships, there are hidden baggage and treasures, that even those carrying those, do not realize they possess. - The twist, turns, & dialectics within this blog string is somewhat evidenciary of that hypothesis. - I now feel badly for Mr. Goldwyn, as it was not my intent to gang up on him and he seems to enjoy using the blog to reach out to try to help people. We can neve have enough people who are honest & passionate in trying to help others, can we? - Best wishes to all.
Ubel The frost Monarch November 14, 2011 at 05:23 am
Everyone needs to calm down and get some Junior mints.
T November 14, 2011 at 07:11 am
Great article! It sounds like you mingled with new people, had a delicious appletini, and livened up the party. That was the whole point of this thing, right? I don't know how this turned into such a moral debate...
Anyhow, as for the age differences: has anyone heard of the Half+7 rule? The youngest age a girl should be is half of the guy's age, plus 7. Example: 40yo man, 27yo woman. Men - use that as your guide to avoid making young women uncomfortable! If you're 50, you should probably avoid chatting up a random young-twenty-something. Stay classy out there!
RONALD M GOLDWYN November 14, 2011 at 09:34 am
Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is amazing how people see things that are not there. How your read things that I did not say. To those who are professionals in the field of societies please note what I said. I tried to say that in my generation, couples got married at an earlier age, and women had children at an earlier age and most couples were virgins at the time of their first marriage, and that was over 50 years ago. I then said how morality is today, without commenting on if it was right or wrong, just that it had changed. I did not use the words "Sexual Revolution" but that was what happened. When I was married, it was a life committment. Today I believe 50% of all marriages end in divorce. I didn't mention couples getting learners permits prior to a marriage License in order to lower the divorce statistic. All that I said was that our society has changed in the last 50 years and our morality is more permissive. I ended by saying that 50 years ago I could go into a bar and drink at age 18 and noone was carded, but I had to be 21 in order to vote. All boys at age 18 had to register for Selective Service, but not the girls. Today you must be 21 to drink in the bar but you may vote at age 18 In my generation we had Ogden Nash, and he said "Candy is dandy, but Liquor is quicker. Those of you who are from a younger generation, please enjoy your freedom, I envy you.
Bob Johansmeyer November 14, 2011 at 12:50 pm
Ron, virginity is its own punishment.
Francine Murtaugh November 14, 2011 at 03:01 pm
Dear George,
I choose romance when men and women and relationships are the topic. As for the unromantic topics that affect our lives, I believe I've seen my share of real and collateral damage as a firefighter, mother of two deployed military officers, and partner of a narcotics/major crime detective in a border state. Kind of you, though, to assume that I speak from naivete.
George E. Mulligan November 14, 2011 at 05:20 pm
Dear Francine,
I appreciate the services that you and your children provide to fellow human beings. Thank you. While topics compliance are nice, there are room for overlap in blogosphere. Francine: what you describe as "naivete," I would describe as a "belief system." What if your beliefs were wrong? What if your sons were put in "harm's way" by effectual criminals? What if people who profit from WAR, CRIME, & DRUGS like having casualties and martyrs, to reinforce the illusions and have those in the Military and Police so concentrated on the "useful idiots" that NO ONE QUESTIONS AUTHORITY that the SYSTEM REINFORCES ITSELF, by having the GUARDIANS fighting the wrong battles. General OMAR BRADLEY said about KOREA: WRONG PLACE WRONG TIME WRONG WAR WRONG ENEMY - ex-General, ex-Supreme Allied Commander, retiring President Eisenhower > Military Industrial (Political) Complex "unwarranted" (you KNOW what that means) "influence over every home, business, & government office" > Scientific Tech-NO-LOGIC-al ELITE "controlling" "PUBLIC OPINION" - Writings of George McGovern (LIBERAL Democrat): The CIA, DOD, FBI violated the Constitution & US Code, here & abroad. FRANK CHURCH Senate Committee = GOOGLE. FBI "ILLEGAL" CoIntel CIA + DOD + others > - Speaking & writing: J K GALBRAITH (Nobel prize/Socialist) + W F BUCKLEY Jr (Ultra Conservative Republican) questions authority. - Maybe I'm wrong? However, I favor Better lives=your family
George E. Mulligan November 14, 2011 at 05:27 pm
Mr. Goldwyn,
It is easy for people to take offense where none was intended, because we all have subjective interpetations & perceptions. I rarely get involved in non political topics. My intent was not to hurt anyone's feelings. This innocuos blog string which I passed on posting a couple times, became very interesting. We learn more from our critics than our supporters. Posting thoughts are very inexact & not always complete.
Lindsay November 14, 2011 at 05:34 pm
Now lets talk about your flawed 50% divorce rate. I had read a few articles that complete discredit this statistic. The divorice rate has, in fact, never reached 50% and has actually been slowly declining. The reason this percentage is wrong is because it assumes that everyone who is getting married in 2010 are also the same ones getting divorced in 2010 - but the truth is, the divorces run the gamut of people from all generations.. meaning that your generation and those after yours but before the current one are adding to the statistics.
Check out this statistic: "According to the report, for people born in 1955 or later, "the proportion ever divorced had actually declined," compared with those among people born earlier. " How about you read a book called "Marriage: A history" it will teach you something. It shows how polls taken in the 20's prove that 50% of women were having premarital sex. Statistics are showing that there is actually a rise in women and men who choose to abstain - so what about or sexual "morality" now? Wouldn't that be you?? Wouldn't that mean that YOUR generation actually has more divorces than those who succeed you? You might also want to read "The Way We Never Were" to help you see through clear glasses instead of the rose-colored ones you wear.
Lindsay November 14, 2011 at 05:34 pm
I re-read every comment here and to be honest, there was VERY little that was assumed through your comments. You flat out said it's inconsiderate to a woman's parents to wait until later in life to have kids. You were very clear in your tone that you feel your generation and it's morals are much more "valid" than the new morality of today, and you very clearly drew a parallel to your man whore grandson and all boys/girls his age. There is no reading between the lines aside from the assumption via your tone about your longing for a "more moral" society.
In response to your comment about morality of your time being MORE PERMISSIVE than the morality of today. Back then your morality allowed you to degrade women and withhold civil rights to individuals. Today, morality says you can not do that - less permissive. You are only talking about sex, and while sex may have been considered more permissive, the truth is that people are not having more sex than before, they are just talking about it more.
Miss Criss November 14, 2011 at 07:53 pm
I totally agree with you on this!
Bobbie November 14, 2011 at 08:23 pm
I think we're all missing the point that the "Boss Lady" here had an excellent supporting role as wing man. You want expensive presents from your boyfriend(s)? Date an old dude from CT.
Crystal_D November 17, 2011 at 03:16 am
Great article! My poor tamagachi spent a few weeks in my fifth grade teacher's drawer when I was too embarressed to tell my parents that it got taken away... again... and for the haters, go date somewhere else and read a different column!
Claire Mielke Davenport December 1, 2011 at 03:09 am
Loved it Ms. Dixon! I must catch up on your other articles.
Tom December 24, 2011 at 09:51 am
George, I was once on the hunt. I didn't even know it at the time but my leave form the Army resulted in me meeting up with some friends who wnated to go camping of all places. Imagine that -- leave from the Army and all there is to do is go back into the woods. They said a group of girls were setting up near the area they had reserved so it seemed good. Wouldn't you know it brother, two days sitting and talking together, eight years dating, and we're now going on sixteen years of marriage. I still think she was the best pick in the park that night. Good piece.
Tom December 24, 2011 at 09:54 am
It was a good piece -- no fluff -- no politics. You kept it honest and I'm not sure how anyone could have been offended -- it was simply a report of your experience that night out. Good luck on the next one.
Say No to Make Your Day in the Stratford schools -- 9 out of ten dentists agree.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Branford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something